["Free Lao"]
Today was museum day - and I hopped on a Tuk-Tuk and headed for Kaysone's house, about a few kilometers from Vientiane's city center. Kaysone is remembered as a preeiminent leader of the resistance and subsequent communist movement, which eventually linked up with other regional Indochina anti-colonial movements (such as the Vietminh), and is regarded as the founder of the country. Yet unlike his counterparts in Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh) or China (Mao), the state apparatus seems to have not spent as much resource promoting his cult. His picture today graces some of the currency - the Kip.
No one else seemed to be at the house - as there was no other tuk tuks outside. I greeted the guard at the guardhouse, an affable 30 something man, and explained that I was interested in visiting Mr. Kaysone's house. He asked what nationality I was and when I explained I was American, he asked to see my passport. I didn't bring it with me so I showed him my California driver's license. He smiled, made a phone call, and indicated the place was closed.
He mentioned something about staff sleeping at the moment. My tuk tuk driver came over and chatted with him a bit. When we took off (not before the guard offered to warmly shake my hand), the tuk tuk driver explained that there was currently no electricity in the house and was therefore closed. Apparently, the house is located in a compound the americans had built when occupying the city during the 60's before abandoning it as part of their withdrawal from the region. Kaysone occupied it after Lao forces regained control of the city. The compound was apparently modelled roughly like an american suburb with tract homes and lawns and such. Inside supposedly was Kaysone's affects such as his yoga mat, french language magazines that showed the man behind the revolution.
Next stop, we headed for the Revolutionary Museum - a massive white building with Soviet styled sculptures of proletariat aiming guns and tools against imaginary imperialist forces. The guard here said it was closing for lunch break (even though it was only 11:15). I managed to convince him to let me in for 5 minutes and dashed off into the building. All the signs were in Lao - so it was hard to follow the narrative. The displays were similiar to the Ho Chih Minh Museum in Saigon and depicted the formation of the resistance and subsequently the communist party and the struggles against the French and then the US. The latter part of the exhibit depicted industrial products (Beer Lao, pharmaceuticals, household goods) that were being produced in Lao today.
In the afternoon, I met up with several Irish backpackers with whom I'd travelled with the day before, and we headed off to the National History Museum. The museum showed artifacts from pre-historical times to the present and had an photographic displays on Lao history in the past 100 years. Particulary interesting were photographs of French officials awaiting to leave after their defeat (smoking pipes in knee high socks with cultivated non-chalance as if at a country club), caves where the Pathet Lao leaders had found refuge from american bombing (which were remarkably outfitted with communications gear and electricity), and photos of American GI's and local protests in Vientiane and against American presence. A glass case showed a macabre set of bomblets, mines, and UXO the Americans left behind (which today still kills and maims many in the countryside).
The story of modern Lao is the same story repeated throughout the region: Western powers such as France, Britain, Japan compete to establish colonies. Exploitation and repression of native populations and resources leads to the development of native nationalism. Moderate nationalist forces are unable to effectively oust foreign occupiers (or are co-opted by Americans). More radical forces, utilizing Communist ideology and built with support from the countryside wage a more effective campaign to win the hearts and minds of the population and defeat foreign imperialists. Americans intervene and occupy, fearing the rise of Communism and the domino effect. Americans prop up corrupt and inept regimes to fight against communism, completely out of touch with the sentiment of the local population and ignorant of the fact that regional communism was ultimately used as a nationalistic tool (and had little to do with proletariats and what not). Americans withdrawl, their puppet regimes collapse. Country is unified or declared fully independent.
This pattern started with China, with our support of the corrupt Chiang Kai Shek (and their subsequent flight to Taiwan), in South Vietnam with the corrupt and reviled President Diem (who was ultimately assasinated by his own generals), in Laos and elsewhere. Unfortunately, with no mechanisms such as freedom of press, protection of human rights or multi-party elections to safeguard against absolute power and corruption, these victorious governments quickly decayed into autocratic, repressive regimes with ailing economies. Some would say that the Americans really did ultimately win the war - as evidenced by these countries' eagerness today to adopt free markets and consumer lifestyles.
When I saw Prime Minister Allawi of Iraq speak to the U.S. Congress this week on BBC about the successes of Iraq, I couldn't help but think of an observation the former U.S. Defense Secretary Mcnamara made in his book "In Retrospect" regarding the Vietnam war. He noted that one of the problems of Vietnam was that the US government was constantly getting a rosy picture from the South Vietnamese government, who were under our pay and eager to keep the dough flowing. The reality on the ground was that the Viet Cong was recruiting more people than we could kill and successfully penetrating deep into the South. The timing of Allawi's speech was suspicious as well - perhaps staged to confront an ever growing unease about the Bush Administration's complete bungling of the Iraq reconstruction during a critical election period.
---
Tonight, I was invited by the Lao projectionist at the French Language Center to view one of his films made during the 70's for the Pathet Lao resistance. I watched a video of his film as he was busily attending to the massive projectors - showing a repeat of thursday's film, "Peut-Etre". He looked pretty much the same some 30 years ago, with the same intense gaze and mustache. The film, shot in black and white, was all in Lao, which kept me from understanding the dialog but the general gist of the story was not hard to follow.
The film opened with scenes of country life in a village: a family going about their farming, quiet scenes of gathering around their teak house living room to eat a traditional meal of sticky rice, soup and vegetables. Later in the film, a rambunctious group of well uniformed Lao soldiers (who were funded and aligned with the Americans), broke into the village with their machine guns and arrested the men and several of the women. The projectionist played a spy who worked for the Lao collaborators. The film culminated with advancing resistance fighters rescuing a woman from the spy. Interesting were some of the scenes of vintage Vientiane nightlife, where Lao bands played beatle-esque pop songs and young men and women shaking tail. I was later to learn that one of the beautiful leading actresses in the film eventually became his wife.
Today there is no film industry in Lao. When you're recovering from fighting for the last 100 years to free your country, other concerns are more pressing. As the american author Fitzegerald once noted, "culture follows money" (as evidenced by the global rise of post-war America in modern art, music and film). Hopefully, the Lao will rise again and regain their voice.